|In late 1847, James Marshall and about 20 men were
sent to the river by John Sutter to build a sawmill.
While building the mill they found gold, not just one
piece, but lots of it. James
Marshall's words were: "I
reached my hand down and picked it up; it made my heart
thump, for I was certain it was gold. The piece was
about half the size and shape of a pea. Then I saw
confirming the discovery was indeed gold, both Marshall
and Sutter made a pact to keep it a secret. Their
personal interests in the region would be undermined if
word got out and gold seekers invaded the area. Needless
to say, their oath of secrecy could not prevent word
of the discovery from getting out. The California Gold
Rush soon blossomed into a full bloomed migration. The urge
to acquire wealth could not be suppressed by the self centered
interests of James Marshall and John Sutter.
it reasonable to assume that Marshall and Sutter could
keep word of the gold discovery from spreading after 20
men had seen it? On the contrary, it was very unreasonable to
assume these men would not tell their families and
friends, who in turn would almost certainly tell others.
Greater Need for Health and Life:
and millions of people are dying from cancer each year. Mothers,
fathers, sons, daughters, friends, etc.... cancer has no
boundaries. In it's final stage, it is a horrible disease that strips all basic
dignities from it's victims. It is the most feared of
all diseases, and it can happen to anybody.
Clark. She says she has found a cure
for cancer. According to her, all cancer is caused by
parasites and toxins in the body. To be cured, one only has to rid the body of the cancer causing parasites
and toxins, and the
cancer will disappear. The cure is a very simple 'alternative'
program that anyone can follow, and for a very little cost - the price of her book, some
supplements and a couple of simple, inexpensive electrical gadgets.
She even provides testimonials
from people who are said to have been cured by going
through her program. The
question arises: If Hulda Clark has indeed found a cure
for cancer, why are so many millions of people still dying from
to proponents of Hulda Clark's cure, millions of
people are still dying from cancer because
the government, the drug companies and
the medical profession are like James Marshall and
John Sutter of the gold rush days. These
large institutions are said to be suppressing the knowledge
of Clark's cure
because cancer is too profitable of a business for them.
surgery, etc., generate huge sums of money for these
people, and they do
not want to lose it to a simple 'alternative' low cost
cancer cure that would put them out of business. Does
this sound reasonable? The people of these
institutions and their family
members are dying from cancer too. Is not their basic need for
health and life also far stronger than their desire for wealth?
Can one really believe that money is more important to
them than their own lives and the lives of their loved
ones? If Hulda's cure was real, they would at least be seeking
it out for themselves, which would in turn add even more
the fire of the word being spread. Considering the countless
number of Clark's books that have been sold, and the
numerous websites promoting them, it is absurd to claim
word of her cure has
been even remotely suppressed.
are all of the people who have been cured of cancer by
following Hulda Clark's parasite cleansing program? One
would think their numbers would be very
high by now because Hulda Clark and others have been promoting
her 'cure' for many years. She first published her book
"A Cure For All Cancers" in 1993. That's over
ten years ago.
it not reasonable to believe that someone who has been
cured of the disease would tell other people who are
also sick, so that they too could be spared from death? Hulda
Clark has posted testimonials on her website. Did these
cured cancer patients keep their miraculous recovery to
themselves, and not tell others? If the people in the
testimonials did tell others, one would expect a
resulting chain reaction incomparable to anything ever witnessed in
history. Unless of course those who were
told were not cured, then any expected chain reaction would have
fizzled out quite quickly.
one really believe that a bureaucracy can conspire to cover up such
a truth? Cancer patients do not live in a bubble. They
attend support groups with other people who have cancer.
They are one of the most informed groups about the
disease because their own lives are at stake. Many of
these people seek out
alternative therapies because standard medicine has not
been able to help them. Word of a real cure would spread
like wildfire among them making the excitement of the California
Gold Rush days seem like child's play. Just as Marshall and Sutter could not prevent
the 20 men from spreading the word of the discovery of
gold, no bureaucracy on earth could prevent, for
example, a father from spending a few dollars on a zapper
(Clark's parasite killer) to save his little
girl from cancer, if
that father had witnessed, or learned by word of mouth, how someone
else had been cured
by Hulda Clark's procedure.
of the people who are promoting Hulda Clark's message?
Do they not have an ethical responsibility to make the
world aware of Hulda's supposed cure? Instead of hiding behind internet websites, and making
themselves feel better through closed internet discussion groups, they should be out marching in the streets to
make the public aware of the 'truth'. If Hulda's followers
really do believe she has a cure for cancer that is being falsely maligned
and suppressed by the establishment, don't they have an
ethical duty to go
out on a limb to save the lives of millions of people
who are dying each year from cancer? To
someone die needlessly, in this society, is a crime. If
Hulda truly has a cure for cancer, those who
got the 'truth' out, would soon be validated, and go
into the history books as heroes, who have done a huge service to
humanity. Why are they not marching in the streets to
promote Hulda Clark's cure? The answer is: They don't
really believe it themselves.
truth, if it is known to some, cannot be suppressed by
even the most powerful of organizations, if
that truth evokes intense emotions like fear and greed. As the
California Gold Rush was inevitable after gold was
discovered, word of Hulda Clark's cure for cancer would also have
been unstoppable if there were any substance to it. News
cure would have made the headlines of every newspaper in
the world and millions of cured
cancer people would be walking about now as proof of her
treatment's effectiveness. Where
are all the cured people? There are but a handful of
people who claim to be cured. They are listed on the testimonial page of Hulda Clark's
website, a few other websites, and some case histories
in Hulda's books..
dreams of 'wealth' provided the fuel to propel the
California Gold Rush into a frenzy, the much stronger
need of 'health and life' failed
to give Hulda Clark's cure for cancer any momentum at all.
This should tell us something. Using common
is reasonable to conclude that Hulda Clark does
not have a cure for cancer.
are welcome and will be posted.
Look at the
titles of Hulda Clark's books. Not only does Hulda Clark claim
to have a cure for all cancers, she has a cure for all
diseases, HIV and Aids too. Are not such grandiose claims
reminiscent of the snake oil salesmen of the Gold Rush
days? According to those hucksters, one bottle of their
medicine cured everything. Would anybody today take
those historic con artists seriously? Probably not. That
being said, how can anybody take Hulda Clark seriously
today? She makes the same kind of claims. Does it make sense to
believe that Hulda Clark has summed up the world's knowledge
of medicine and disease in a couple of books?
Cure For All Cancers: Excerpts
from the book
The Cure For HIV and
from the book
The Cure For All
from the book.
The Cure For All
The Prevention Of
of Hulda Clark's Pseudo Science
A search for the words
'Hulda, Clark and cancer' on Google
returns hundreds of links, in many different languages, about
Clark's theories and cancer treatment. The whole world has
instant access to
information about Clark's
protocol. In light of the large
numbers of Clark websites returned by the Google search, it is
completely unreasonable to maintain that the medical
establishment has in any way been successful in
suppressing Clark's ideas.
are very small fraction of the many thousands of Hulda Clark related websites that were returned by the
Bizarre Claims of Hulda Clark by Stephen Barrett,
Dr. Clark Information Center: The official bio of
Hulda Clark as put out by the Clark Research
Hulda Clark webpage. (nothing scientific about
Book Review of Hulda Clark's "A Cure For All
Diseases" by Stephanie Relfe B.Sc. (Syd.). Also has
Hulda Clark's books for sale.
Clark University.Org: A non-profit organization
claiming to be not run by Hulda Clark. Lots of official
Hulda stuff here.
Clark's "A Cure For All Cancers" by Steve Dunn.
A highly critical essay on Clarks theories with sound
reasoning to back it up.
End Of Cancer? by Margarat Rathwell. An exposition
of Clark's protocol.
Clark's online bookstore.
Quackery Watch: All kinds of unflattering Clark
stuff here... all backed up too.
Excerpts from Hulda Clark's book "A Cure For All
Clark's Victims: The Hanne's Story. "The Cure
For All Cancers" - Except Hanne's by Pia Johansen
Clark University: That intestinal fluke, the
Fasciolopsis Buskii, not only causes all cancers, it
causes AIDS too!
all about Cancer: Claims to disclose the truth about
cancer... speaks highly of Hulda Clark.
For Healing: A short exposition of Hulda Clark's
theories. Hulda's books are for sale as well.
Hulda Clark's books.
State of Indiana VS Hulda Clark. Hulda's trouble
with the law.
- Dr. Hulda Clark Cures ! A Hulda Clark yahoo news
group set up by CureZone.com.
troubles with the law for Hulda Clark
A little discussion on Hulda Clark in the Vegsourse
Clark's Method. Three Days of Training with Dr. Hulda
Clark by Dr. Charles McWilliams
& Frequency Research by Hulda Regehr
Clark, Ph.D., N.D.
"Study About Hulda Clark's Zapper
Successful"... more on the Zapper!
Jordan's Bioelectric Medicine Links for Hulda Clark
and Royal Raymond Rife
All one would ever have to know about Hulda Clark's
Clark's Syncrometer - an inexpensive diagnostic device:
by Dennis Harwood
"$10 Ten Minute Treatment For CANCER/AIDS?... Too
Good to be true? Maybe! Read the evidence and make up
your own mind!"
Hulda "Quack Quack" Clark: Hulda Clark is
definitely not liked by everyone.
Inside Out: "Inside Out, with the help of John
Inchley, goes underground to investigate therapists who
falsely claim to cure cancer".
Hotline forum: A couple of letters... for and
against Hulda Clark.
Millenium Project: A website not at all friendly to
Hulda Clark and with good reasons to back it up
on Hulda Clark-2003 Rife Conf.
Clark: A complete reprint of Hulda Clark's book
"A Cure For All Diseases"
critical essay of Hulda Regehr Clark by William T.
Clark Book Collection, with a special offer for
106.90 Australian dollars
Cure For All Cancer: This website gives an abstract
and summary of Clark's book. Also sells other medicines
"The Grape Cancer Cure" to cure cancer. Claims
to have a "Natural cancer treatment that's
10,000 times stronger than chemotherapy - but without
the side effects".
closer look at Hulda Regehr Clark. Clark maintains
that the Fasciolopsis Buski parasite causes all cancers.
This website refutes that claim,
Hulda Clark related websites on the web than
anyone would care to read. Clark's book "A Cure For All Cancers"
was first published in 1993. After over ten years of
promoting her treatment, the question remains. Where are
all of the cured people? Commonsense tells us that Hulda Clark does
not have a cure for cancer.